Vegas/Edius/PR专业视频特效/转场插件套装 Boris FX是一套专业的视频后期处理插件套装，
里面拥有众多插件和预设：光效，抠像，调色，修复工具，视觉特效，转场，合成，运动跟踪，模糊，三维形状……
拥有超过220种效果，插件还拥有独立控制界面和时间线，
Over 220 Filters from Boris Continuum Complete and Filter Effects Complete
Redesigned Custom User Interface with Dockable Tabbed Palettes
Image Restoration & Retouching
Full Suite of Color Correction Tools including new 3 Way Color Grade
Foreground Object Removal
3D Shapes such as Cylinders, Spheres and Cubes
Spline Based Masking System
Upstream and Downstream Masking
Motion Blur
Motion Tracking, Image Stabilization, and Corner Pinning
Support for 3rd Party After Effects Plug-in Filters
Library Browser with Hundreds of Preset Animations
Sony Vegas 聽10-13
Edius 7
Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 – CC 2014
孤单枪手之重临(AlienShooter:Revisited)v1.0 英文版
21.6M / 英文05-01
GARNET CRADLE Sugary Sparkle
482.1M / 日文10-16
NBA LIVE 2005中文白金版
221.4M / 中文08-12
NBA LIVE 2006中文版
1.16G / 繁体08-06
NBA LIVE 2004
822.7M / 中文08-08
NBA LIVE 2008中文版
264.8M / 繁体08-13
NBA LIVE 2007中文版
333.8M / 繁体08-07
死亡之谷 简体中文汉化Flash版
14.6M / 中文10-22
DNF大头Flash2.1
7.6M / 其它10-31
NBA Live 2003
264.0M / 英文08-14
131.7M / 11-29
媒体制作
下载
13M / 09-29
视频处理
下载
5.6M / 02-29
转换翻译
下载That鈥檚 >3x faster for NVMe. But speed isn鈥檛 everything.
NVMe (PCIe 4.0): ~7,000 MB/s sequential reads. UFS 3.1: ~2,100 MB/s max.
NVMe is significantly faster than UFS 3.1 in almost every metric, but UFS 3.1 is optimized for mobile power efficiency.
A typical PCIe 4.0 NVMe drive hits sequential read. UFS 3.1 tops out around 2,100 MB/s 鈥� faster than SATA SSDs, but less than half of NVMe.
| Metric | NVMe (PCIe 4.0 x4) | UFS 3.1 | |--------|--------------------|---------| | Max sequential read | ~7,000 MB/s | ~2,100 MB/s | | Max sequential write | ~5,000 MB/s | ~1,200 MB/s | | Random read (4KB) | ~800k 鈥� 1M IOPS | ~100k 鈥� 200k IOPS | | Random write (4KB) | ~600k 鈥� 1M IOPS | ~70k 鈥� 150k IOPS | | Interface | PCIe (3.0/4.0/5.0) | MIPI M-PHY | | Duplex | Full duplex (read+write simultaneously) | Half duplex | | Power efficiency | Lower (higher active power) | Higher (better for battery) | | Typical use | PCs, consoles, servers | Smartphones, tablets, dashcams |
"NVMe and UFS 3.1 both use PCIe technology, but here鈥檚 the speed breakdown.
Here鈥檚 content tailored for different platforms and purposes, comparing (common in PCs, high-end laptops, PS5) and UFS 3.1 (common in flagship smartphones, automotive, some ultra-portables). Option 1: Short-form content (Instagram/TikTok/YouTube Shorts script) Visual: Split screen 鈥� left side NVMe SSD, right side smartphone chip.
NVMe for performance, UFS for mobile. 馃敟馃摫馃捇 #nvme #ufs31 #techcomparison Option 2: Detailed table & summary (blog post / comparison article) Title: NVMe vs UFS 3.1 Speed: Which Storage Interface Is Faster?
That鈥檚 >3x faster for NVMe. But speed isn鈥檛 everything.
NVMe (PCIe 4.0): ~7,000 MB/s sequential reads. UFS 3.1: ~2,100 MB/s max.
NVMe is significantly faster than UFS 3.1 in almost every metric, but UFS 3.1 is optimized for mobile power efficiency.
A typical PCIe 4.0 NVMe drive hits sequential read. UFS 3.1 tops out around 2,100 MB/s 鈥� faster than SATA SSDs, but less than half of NVMe.
| Metric | NVMe (PCIe 4.0 x4) | UFS 3.1 | |--------|--------------------|---------| | Max sequential read | ~7,000 MB/s | ~2,100 MB/s | | Max sequential write | ~5,000 MB/s | ~1,200 MB/s | | Random read (4KB) | ~800k 鈥� 1M IOPS | ~100k 鈥� 200k IOPS | | Random write (4KB) | ~600k 鈥� 1M IOPS | ~70k 鈥� 150k IOPS | | Interface | PCIe (3.0/4.0/5.0) | MIPI M-PHY | | Duplex | Full duplex (read+write simultaneously) | Half duplex | | Power efficiency | Lower (higher active power) | Higher (better for battery) | | Typical use | PCs, consoles, servers | Smartphones, tablets, dashcams |
"NVMe and UFS 3.1 both use PCIe technology, but here鈥檚 the speed breakdown.
Here鈥檚 content tailored for different platforms and purposes, comparing (common in PCs, high-end laptops, PS5) and UFS 3.1 (common in flagship smartphones, automotive, some ultra-portables). Option 1: Short-form content (Instagram/TikTok/YouTube Shorts script) Visual: Split screen 鈥� left side NVMe SSD, right side smartphone chip.
NVMe for performance, UFS for mobile. 馃敟馃摫馃捇 #nvme #ufs31 #techcomparison Option 2: Detailed table & summary (blog post / comparison article) Title: NVMe vs UFS 3.1 Speed: Which Storage Interface Is Faster?
