In BW 3.5 and 7.0, your fact tables (F-fact tables and E-fact tables) were designed to minimize disk I/O for row-based databases like Oracle or DB6. But on HANA, row storage is poison. It destroys parallelization.
If you have administered or developed on SAP BW 7.4 (the last great "classic" BW release before the HANA-only revolution), you know the truth: It was a hybrid beast. sap bw 7.4 practical guide pdf 28
Have your own page 28 story from BW 7.4? Share your worst "HANA hangover" tale in the comments below. In BW 3
Let’s crack open what that page really meant—and why its lessons are more critical today than ever. BW 7.4 was billed as "HANA-powered." But if you migrated an old system, you quickly realized that simply flipping the switch to "HANA-optimized" didn't fix everything. The practical guide on page 28 likely pointed to a single, brutal truth: Your InfoProviders were still physically optimized for row-based storage. If you have administered or developed on SAP BW 7
Page 28 wasn't about the BEx Analyzer or the new CompositeProvider. No. Page 28 was the troubleshooting manifesto . It was the section that taught you how to stop building and start healing .
Page 28 would show you the dark art of the — specifically, how to convert your cube to "cube merge" mode and enable INMEMORY_AGGREGATION .
Page 28 of a good practical guide would have shown you the exact ABAP report to run: RSDDB_INDEX_ANALYZE and, more importantly, RSDD_HDB_TRANSFER_DBSTATS .